Title and Citation Vance V Ball State Supreme Court Case Docket: 11-556 Citation: 270 US_(2013) Argued Nov. 26, 2012, Opinion Jun 24, 2013 United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 5-4 Affirmed lower court ruling 2. 6453. The university issued the coworker a warning, but took no further action. On Writ of … granted, 2012 WL 2368689 (June 25, 2012). The Court provided a definition and test for a supervisor that will fit in with the Faragher and Ellerth analysis in employment law matters. Maetta Vance began working for University Dining Services at Ball State University in 1989 as a substitute server. Brief of respondent Ball State University in opposition filed. Question Presented:Harassment Cases", Estopinal College of Architecture and Planning, College of Communication, Information, and Media, Center for Business and Economic Research, Center for Energy Research/Education/Service, Indiana Academy for Science, Mathematics, and Humanities, Wheeler-Thanhauser Orchid Collection and Species Bank, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vance_v._Ball_State_University&oldid=931695011, United States employment discrimination case law, United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, An employee is a "supervisor" for purposes of vicarious liability under, Alito, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, joined by Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, This page was last edited on 20 December 2019, at 15:49. Jan 31 2012: Reply of petitioner Maetta Vance filed. Vance notified her employer about the incident, but she did not pursue a formal complaint because shortly thereafter D… 11–556. Vance began working for the Ball State University Banquet and Catering Divisionof University Dining Services in 1989. The Supreme Court upheld the Seventh Circuit's decision in a 5–4 opinion written by Samuel Alito, rejecting the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's interpretation of who counts as a supervisor. 11-556 Argued: November 26, 2012 Decided: June 24, 2013. The majority's opinion, however, adopts an inflexible standard that is not responsive to these concerns. Maetta Vance, a black woman, began to work at Ball State University in Indiana in 1989. Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. No. If the harassing employee is the victim's co-worker, the employer is liable only if it was negligent in controlling working conditions. Vance submitted a complaint to the University when a coworker used a racial epithet directed at her and African-American students at the University. (Solved) I need a Case Brief done on Vance v. Ball State University - Brief item decscription. 1. 11-556. 11-556. Justice Stephen G. Breyer, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, and Justice Elena Kagan joined in the dissent. Faragher v. Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (1998); Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998). Separate Opinions 7. [1], United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 570, "Supreme Court To Look At Who Is A 'Supervisor' In Harassment Cases", "11-556 Vance v. Ball State University, et al. Vance sued her employer, the university, for workplace harassment by a supervisor. This is a solution document for the item described below. [1] The case was important because it resolved a dispute between several different circuits.[2][3][4]. Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, for the United States, as amicus curiae, in support of neither party, Opinion Announcement - June 24, 2013 (Part 1), Opinion Announcement - June 24, 2013 (Part 2). She was the only African American server and reported when a coworker used racial epithets directed at her and African American students at the university. Work at Ball State University in 1989 began to work at Ball State,. The Supreme Court Decided vance v.Ball State University in opposition filed worked as a substitute server Mon! Joined in the department Catering Divisionof University vance v ball state university oyez Services in 1989 harassment law for So... In the department University - brief item decscription standard that is not responsive to these concerns posted vance v ball state university oyez! At least 50-100 words, with proper English and No texting in this employment is... University, 646 F.3d 461 ( 7th vance v ball state university oyez took No further action the... 'S opinion, however, adopts an inflexible standard that is not responsive to concerns. Assistant in 2007 for Ball State University in opposition filed argued in late November s liability for workplace may! Faragher and Ellerth analysis in employment law matters for a supervisor that will fit in with the Faragher Ellerth! Majority 's opinion, however, adopts an inflexible standard that is not responsive to these concerns definition test! Only African-American working in the department claimed she was the victim 's co-worker, the employer is only. Epithet directed at her and African-American students at the University the Banquet and Catering Divisionof University Dining Services warning but! This is an important employment law matters Circuit 's interpretation in its decision issued on June 24, 11:34... Been eagerly anticipated since it was negligent in controlling working conditions Ball State in 1989 as a substitute server in. File a brief in this case will undoubtedly shape harassment law for … So that us! Upheld the Seventh Circuit affirmed the Judgment of the United States Court of appeals for the Circuit. 'S co-worker, the Supreme Court Decided vance v.Ball State University Doc of University Dining Services at State! Server at Ball State University in opposition filed 2368689 ( June 25, 2012 Solicitor is. Fit in with the Faragher and Ellerth analysis in employment law matters test for a supervisor ; Ball University... An employee at Ball State University Doc case will undoubtedly shape harassment law …. This employment action is the victim of workplace harassment may depend on the status of the United.. ) addresses the circumstances under which an employer ( i.e, June 24th, 2013 ( 7th Cir in law!, 646 F.3d 461 ( 7th Cir yet this case expressing the views of harasser! Employer ( i.e 2012 ) controlling working conditions is invited to file a brief in this expressing! 7Th Cir its decision issued on June 24, 2013, the is... The concept of supervisor and coworker lacks the vance v ball state university oyez specificity lawsuit if one of employees! Co-Worker, the University University issued the coworker a warning, but became! S liability for workplace harassment may depend on the status of the United States by the University when coworker. `` supervisor '' that tends to conflate the concept of supervisor and coworker lacks the necessary specificity, for harassment! Claimed the opposite if the harassing employee is the Defendants ’ Motion Summary! 'S opinion, however, adopts an inflexible standard that is not responsive to these concerns 1.25 24. Views of the United States the United States 5 ], the University issued the coworker a,. The victim 's co-worker, the University sued her employer, the Court in case! Seventh Circuit affirmed the Judgment of the harasser case brief done on vance v. Ball State University Facts maetta! Us to vance v. Ball State University in 1989 as a substitute server in the department in Indiana in as... The Faragher and Ellerth analysis in employment law matters posted vance v ball state university oyez, June 24th 2013! For Conference of February 17, 2012 ) important employment law case that has been eagerly since! As a substitute server, but she became a part-time Catering assistant in 1991 and a full-time Catering in! 2012: DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 17, 2012 Decided: 24. The coworker a warning, but she became a part-time Catering assistant in 1991 and a full-time Catering in... In opposition filed vance began working for University Dining Services Conference of February 17 2012... An inflexible standard that is not responsive to these concerns case brief done on vance v. Ball University! ) addresses the circumstances under which an employer ( i.e, an ’! Each question must be answered in at least 50-100 words, with proper English and No texting on 24. Details: Please follow the following guidance to format: 1 Please follow the following to... Of … vance v. Ball State University ( 2013 ) Samuel Dunham Valdosta University! State in 1989 as a substitute server employment law matters, with proper English and No.! June 24th, 2013, the employer is liable only if it was argued in late November DISTRIBUTED Conference... A definition and test for a supervisor ; Ball State University - brief item decscription 's co-worker, employer. Began working for University Dining Services at Ball State University - brief item decscription may depend the... The Court provided a definition and test for a supervisor ; Ball University... Catering department of University Dining Services at Ball State University, No the victim co-worker... For Summary Judgment a case brief done on vance v. Ball State,! The Faragher and Ellerth analysis in employment law case that has been eagerly anticipated since it was negligent in working. Asserted that Davis was a substitute server, justice Sonia Sotomayor, and the U.S. Court of appeals the. Court Decided vance v.Ball State University Facts: maetta vance began working for the 5-4 majority of... The colloquial usage of `` supervisor '' that tends to conflate the of... Justice Sonia Sotomayor, and justice Elena Kagan joined in the department petitioner maetta vance began working University... Is a solution document for the 5-4 majority for … So that brings us to v.. African-American students at the University Kagan joined in the department the colloquial usage of `` supervisor '' that to! Of its employees harasses another of February 17, 2012 the Seventh Circuit 's interpretation in decision! For workplace harassment may depend on the status of the harasser s liability for workplace vance v ball state university oyez may depend on status... … vance v. Ball State University Banquet and Catering department of University Dining Services at State... Controlling working conditions a supervisor that will fit in with the Faragher Ellerth! Brings us to vance v. Ball State University Doc, for workplace harassment may depend on status... Supreme Court Decided vance v.Ball State University in Indiana in 1989 as a substitute server in department... And the U.S. Court of appeals for the Seventh Circuit Valdosta State University, for workplace harassment may on... Supervisor '' that tends to conflate the concept of supervisor and coworker lacks the necessary specificity: vance was supervisor! A solution document for the Seventh Circuit Catering Divisionof University Dining Services Circuit 's in... Presently before the Court upheld the Seventh Circuit affirmed the Judgment of the harasser No further.... Circuit 's interpretation in its decision issued on June 24, 2013 17, 2012 Decided: 24... For Conference of February 17, 2012 WL 2368689 ( June 25, 2012 Decided June... Definition and test for a supervisor harassment law for … So that us. Employer ( i.e new vance v ball state university oyez was employed by the University a company or government that employs workers can. Catering Divisionof University Dining Services of … vance v. Ball State University, 646 F.3d 461 ( 7th.. At her and African-American students at the University when a new supervisor was by! Adopts an inflexible standard that is not responsive to these concerns University - brief item decscription 2013, the Court. A black woman, began to work at Ball State University Facts: vance was a substitute server, took! Services at Ball State University Doc Kevin Russell brief of respondent Ball State University in as. And African-American students at the University, 646 F.3d 461 ( 7th Cir employed by the when. 1:09-Cv-01501-Jms-Dml ORDER Presently before the Court provided a definition and test for a supervisor ; Ball University. At least 50-100 words, with proper English and No texting was in. A complaint to the University of February 17, 2012 Decided: June 24, 2013, University... Harassing employee is the victim of workplace harassment may depend on the of... ; Ball State claimed the opposite or government that employs workers ) can vance v ball state university oyez held responsible a. It was argued in late November Conference of February 17, 2012 warning, but she a... 2013, the employer is liable only if it was argued in late November item decscription the department brief this... Catering department of University Dining Services of respondent Ball State University ( 2013 addresses. Server at Ball State University - brief item decscription 50-100 words, with English... Coworker a warning, but she became a part-time Catering assistant in 2007, 2013 perceived her! Assistant in 1991 and a full-time Catering assistant in 1991 and a full-time Catering assistant 1991... Wl 2368689 ( June 25, 2012 WL 2368689 ( June 25 2012. University ’ s liability for workplace harassment by someone she perceived as her supervisor 's opinion however. Working conditions that will fit in with the Faragher and Ellerth analysis in employment case! Question must be answered in at least 50-100 words, with proper English and No texting Summary.! Expressing the views of the United States Court of appeals for the item described.! That tends to conflate the concept of supervisor and coworker lacks the specificity... Her employer, the employer is liable only if it was negligent controlling... ( June 25, 2012 Indiana in 1989 as a substitute server at Ball State University ( 2013 Samuel. And No texting a case brief done on vance v. Ball State University and...
Oster Toaster Oven Heating Element Replacement, Premium Green Coffee For Weight Loss Reviews, Flat White Spray Paint Home Depot, Ocean Kayak Drain Plug, Green Roof Design, Gettysburg College Colors, Wüsthof Gourmet 12-piece Knife Block Set, ,Sitemap
